Intermittent claudication (IC)
Overview:
- Is the mildest manifestation of lower limb ischaemia (LLI)
- Affects ~5% of men >60 years of age
- In the majority, it is the consequence of narrowing or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery in the thigh
Symptoms:
- Ischaemic muscle pain on walking that is relieved by rest
- To begin walking again causes re-arrest after the same distance has been travelled
- At rest, the blood requirement is met by the collateral circulation through the profunda femoris system:
- Joins the popliteal artery below the blockage usually just above the knee
- However, exercise produces a demand which cannot be met and the calf muscles become ischaemic
- Cycling may be used as an alternative to walking as this relies predominantly on the thigh muscles
- If stenosis is more proximal (aortoiliac), then pain is felt in the whole leg and even the buttock if the blood flow to the internal iliac artery is compromised
Leriche syndrome:
- Difficulty or impossibility of sustaining an erection
- Consequent upon an aortoiliac obstruction
Signs:
- The limb may be obviously ischaemic
- Pulses are usually diminished or absent below the femoral but, if they are present, exercise causes their disappearance
Diagnosis:
- There are many causes of pain in the leg, of which arterial disease is only one
- Much of the time of a vascular service is spent excluding other disorders
- Pain that radiates from the back, hip and knee joint, OA and venous outflow obstruction (venous claudication) may all be difficult to distinguish from true arterial claudication
Management:
Arterial claudication is common, but progression to critical ischaemia is unlikely. Anxious patients should be reassured that amputation is unlikely. The risks for arterial surgery or amputation are <1-2% per year. However, certain patients are at risk of disease progression, including those who:
- Present with severe claudication of less than 50m
- Have low ABPI (<0.5)
- Have multilevel or distal disease
- Are diabetic
- Continue to smoke
Such patients need careful assessment, aggressive treatment of risk factors and the offer of reconstruction or endovascular therapy if and when critical limb ischaemia develops
Medical therapy:
For many years, the standard treatment for the majority of patients has been to stop smoking and keep walking. All should be:
- Reassured that the legs are not in imminent danger
- Warned about the hazards of continued smoking
- Screened and treated for correctable risk factors (e.g. diabetes, hyperlipidaemia)
- Told to exercise regularly to the point of pain in order to develop collateral circulation
The majority accept the wisdom of this advice and attempt to alter their lifestyle. However, a proportion will not comply and/or will not accept their level of disability and in these, intervention may have to be considered
Surgical intervention:
- Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
- Operation
Operation:
Aortoiliac (supra-inguinal) disease:
There is a lower threshold for reconstruction in this arterial segment because:
- The ability to compensate for aortoiliac occlusion by formation of collaterals is not as good as it is in infra-inguinal disease
- The long-term result of aortoiliac reconstruction is considerably better than in infra-inguinal bypass; more than 80% of aortobifemoral grafts for claudication are patent at 10 years
- Bilateral claudication can be corrected by a single operation
- Those affected by aortoiliac disease are generally younger and more likely to have their livelihood threatened by their disability
Infra-inguinal disease:
By contrast, there is much less enthusiasm for infra-inguinal bypass because:
- Compensation by collateral development is often good
- At 5 years, less than 70% of femoropopliteal grafts are still patent
- Bilateral claudication is common, requires 2 operations and so doubles the risk
- Insertion of a bypass graft leads to involution of collateral pathways; if the graft blocks, the patient nearly always returns to a worse level of ischaemia than that present before operation
- Rest pain may develop after a failed graft and force re-operation; the long-term results of such procedures are less impressive than those of primary reconstruction